Comparative negligence has largely replaced contributory negligence in many jurisdictions, allowing for a more equitable distribution of fault. Under this system, a plaintiff can recover damages proportionate to the defendant's share of the blame. For example, if a plaintiff is found to be 20% at fault, they can still recover 80% of the damages from the defendant. This approach contrasts sharply with the all-or-nothing rule of contributory negligence, offering a more flexible and fair system for assessing liability in negligence cases.