Game theory has been enriched by numerous experiments that have provided valuable insights into human behavior and strategic decision-making. Here are some of the most famous game theory experiments:
1. Prisoner's Dilemma
The Prisoner's Dilemma is perhaps the most well-known game in game theory. It involves two players who must decide whether to cooperate or betray each other. The classic scenario is that two suspects are interrogated separately, and each must decide whether to confess (betray) or remain silent (cooperate). The outcomes are:
If both remain silent, they both get a moderate sentence.
If one betrays and the other remains silent, the betrayer goes free, and the silent one gets a harsh sentence.
If both betray each other, they both get a moderate sentence.
Preview
This game highlights the tension between individual rationality and collective benefit, often leading to suboptimal outcomes where both players betray each other.
2. Ultimatum Game
In the Ultimatum Game, one player (the proposer) is given a sum of money to divide between themselves and another player (the responder). The proposer makes an offer, and the responder can either accept or reject it. If the offer is accepted, both players receive the proposed amounts. If it is rejected, neither player gets anything. Traditional game theory predicts that the proposer will offer the smallest possible amount and the responder will accept any non-zero offer. However, experiments show that many proposers offer more than the minimum, and responders often reject low offers, indicating a preference for fairness over strict rationality.
3. Dictator Game
The Dictator Game is a variation of the Ultimatum Game where the proposer has complete control over the division of the money, and the responder has no say in the matter. This game is used to study altruism and fairness. Unlike the Ultimatum Game, where strategic considerations come into play, the Dictator Game isolates altruistic behavior by removing the threat of rejection. Experiments show that many proposers give some portion of the money to the responder, indicating a preference for fairness even when not required to do so.
4. Trust Game
The Trust Game involves two players: an investor and a trustee. The investor is given a sum of money and can choose to send some or all of it to the trustee. The amount sent is tripled by the experimenter before reaching the trustee. The trustee then decides how much to return to the investor. This game measures trust and reciprocity. Experiments show that investors often send a significant portion of their money, and trustees often return more than they received, indicating a level of trust and reciprocity beyond what strict rationality would predict.
5. Battle of the Sexes
The Battle of the Sexes is a coordination game where two players prefer different outcomes but would rather be together than apart. For example, a couple might prefer different activities (e.g., one prefers a movie, and the other prefers a concert), but both would rather be together than do their preferred activity alone. This game highlights the challenges of coordination and communication in achieving mutually beneficial outcomes.
6. Public Goods Game
In the Public Goods Game, players are given an endowment and can choose to contribute some or all of it to a public pool. The total amount in the pool is multiplied by a factor and then distributed equally among all players, regardless of their contribution. This game models situations like taxation or environmental conservation, where individual contributions benefit everyone but come at a personal cost. Experiments show that while some players contribute generously, others free-ride on the contributions of others, leading to suboptimal outcomes unless mechanisms like punishment or communication are introduced.These experiments have significantly contributed to our understanding of strategic interactions and human behavior, demonstrating that real-world behavior often deviates from theoretical predictions due to factors like fairness, altruism, and social norms.